2025年4月11日，星期五，第1224期

结合1936年纳粹德国军队悍然进入莱茵非军事区，再谈中国第一时间、第一个对美国全面犀利反击的极端重要性

【媒体报道】

4月11日，外交部发言人宣布：应越南共产党中央委员会总书记苏林、越南社会主义共和国主席梁强邀请，*******、*******将于4月14日至15日对越南进行国事访问。应马来西亚最高元首易卜拉欣、柬埔寨国王西哈莫尼邀请，*******将于4月15日至18日对马来西亚、柬埔寨进行国事访问。

【讨论纪要】

●西班牙首相桑切斯访华是顶着美国的压力进行的

4月9日，美财长贝森特表示，中国是迄今为止唯一一个对关税做出强硬回应的国家，其他国家不要与中国合作。此外，贝森特他=还点名西班牙，称一位西班牙决策者本周发表了一些考虑与中国建立更紧密关系的言论，“那样做无异于自割咽喉”。

4月10日，在一起直升机坠河事故中，西门子西班牙分部总裁兼首席执行官奥古斯丁·埃斯科瓦尔及其家人被确认为其中的五名遇难者。

同日，中国外交部发言人林剑对美财长贝森特的相关言论进行驳斥。林剑强调，中西关系是中欧关系的重要组成部分。去年，中国同西班牙的贸易额突破500亿美元，西班牙对华出口增长了4.3%。近年来中国企业在西班牙开展新能源产业合作，助力绿色低碳发展，两国在多边领域保持沟通，共同维护以联合国为核心的国际体系和以世贸组织为核心的多边贸易体制。正如中国同其他各国的良好关系一样，中西合作始终为两国经济添动力、为人民添福祉、为世界稳定和发展添助力。

上述三则新闻报道都出现在西班牙首相桑切斯访华的背景下。有网友甚至将4月10日西门子西班牙分部总裁兼首席执行官奥古斯丁·埃斯科瓦尔及其家人直升机遇难事故与西班牙首相桑切斯访华联系起来进行观察。对此，我们想说的是：其一，网友的这种联想并非完全没有道理；其二，西班牙首相桑切斯访华是顶着美国的压力进行的。

●基于纳粹德国派军悍然进入莱茵非军事区的历史，再次强调中国第一个，第一时间对美国全面犀利反击的极端重要性

当然，顶着美国压力访华的不仅有西班牙的政要，还有英国的高官，比如，英国贸易大臣和国防参谋长同时访华。对此，我们想问的是，作为欧洲主要国家之一的德国政要是不是也在盘算尽快访华呢？而这些欧洲政要扎堆访华的真实目的又是什么呢？我们不妨通过再次回顾本次中国第一个，第一时间全面犀利反击美国的极端重要性中寻找答案。

第二次世界大战爆发之前，以美国为典型代表，疯狂的关税战导致世界经济大萧条，这成为希特勒政府上台执政德国的重要契机。

1936年3月7日，希特勒命令德军悍然跨过莱茵河，开进莱茵非军事区。莱茵非军事区源自第一次世界大战，为了使德军与其宿敌法军脱离接触，《凡尔赛和约》和《洛迦诺公约》规定，德国境内莱茵河以东50公里为非军事区。如德军进入，法军有权采取军事行动，英国则有义务以武装力量支持法国。这一事件导致希特勒声名大噪，其支持率急剧上升。此后，希特勒便在民粹主义、纳粹主义和独裁统治的不归路上一去不回头。随之而来的便是第二次世界大战的全面爆发。

今天的美国特朗普政府针对世界，尤其是中国发动“关税战”，在性质上非常类似希特勒政府当年在莱茵非军事区问题上的处理方式，区别在于前者的冒险首先基于传统安全层面，而后者则基于非传统安全层面。恰恰是中国选择第一个，第一时间对美国进行全面犀利反击：

第一，打断了这种性质上非常危险的冒险行为，并且极大压缩了对方采取更极端、更冒险行为的可能操作空间；

第二，在“第一”的基础上，鉴于“关税战”带有明显的“摊牌”性质（当然，这种“摊牌”更多是一种极限讹诈层面，最典型的案例就是特朗普所谓的“灵活性”，“前一秒战略冒险，后一秒就妥协认怂”），极大压缩了对方采取更极端、更冒险行为的可能操作空间就包括了，将这种基于非传统安全层面的危机向传统安全层面外溢的可能性降到最低。

第三，在“第一”“第二”的基础上，避免中国落入被孤立、被诋毁，甚至被攻击（基于非传统安全层面）的陷阱之中。以越南为例，陷阱的意思就在于，特朗普政府对越南加46%关税一事，内嵌的歹毒意图——如果中国应对错误，极可能落入被污蔑“双标、欺软怕硬”的陷阱，进而遭遇某些国家跟随美国对华加征关税。

以越南为例，污蔑中国“双标、欺软怕硬”有一个前提条件，那就是中国应对错误，也就是没有在第一时间，第一个对美国进行全面犀利反击。越南的理由是，既然中国都对美国“关税战”忌惮三分，进而不敢第一时间，第一个对美国进行全面犀利反击，作为比中国弱小得多得多的越南自然更加惧怕美国。以此为由，越南跟随美国对中国加征关税就是“合情合理”。如果中国此时此刻对越南进行反制，越南就会污蔑中国“双标、欺软怕硬”——只敢对越南这样的小国进行反制报复，却对美国退避三舍。对中国来说，恰恰由于应对正确，第一时间，第一个对美国进行全面犀利反击，进而对越南这样的国家传递的强烈信号就是：即便是美国，中国也一样坚决反制、奉陪到底，何况越南？如果越南敢为虎作伥，那就别怪中国下手无情！这就叫“立规矩”！

在我们看来，对越南这样的国家，中国要准备一整套应对方案，比如，枪打出头鸟。越南对中美经济都很依赖，尤其对中国经济依赖更严重。越南当局很清楚，美国对其加关税那么高到底是什么意思。值得一提的是，越南当局在跟随美国对华加关税的问题上有所试探，但遭到了中国的强烈警告。所以，中国的正确应对，一方面，防止中国落入类似越南这样的国家跟着美国咬的被动局面；另一方面，从反方向拉高越南这样的国家和美国之间媾和的成本，迫使其在“立规矩”效应下，不得不仔细计算，尤其在实实在在的经济利益层面，到底是跟随美国得利多，还是跟着中国得利多。

在特朗普看来，中国很可能采取类似应对2017年“洞朗事件”中那种步步为营的应对策略。或者说，特朗普之所以敢于悍然发动“关税战”，显然与其对“中国以追逐‘河渡人’为最优战略选项”的理解有误。

所谓“理解有误”的意思就在于，特朗普忘了另一面：尽管中国以追逐“河渡人”为最优战略选项，但在必要时刻，完全可以立刻终止“以追逐‘河渡人’为最优战略选项”。

在第二次世界大战全面爆发之初，当时的美国采取的是“中立政策”，通过与交战双方做生意坐收渔利。但在日本帝国在袭击珍珠港后，也就是日本对美国“不可逆”的选择“摊牌”后，果断中止了“中立政策”对日宣战并全面加入第二次世界大战。值得一提的是，日本帝国之所以对美国“不可逆”的选择“摊牌”，主要原因在于，随着二战的全面爆发，美国对日慢慢收紧绞索，比如，经济制裁和贸易禁运。而在这背后则是美国争夺的某种主导权——独霸西太，最终导致美日之间全面开战。

值得一提的是，特朗普发动“关税战”恰恰就明显带有“摊牌”性质，并以此为筹码进行豪赌，可惜，这次特朗普赌输了。

●从特朗普政府上台伊始大玩“合纵连横，远交近攻”到今天，过去了快三个月，美国却把自己的传统盟友们完成成为“渔翁”

中国这次就当起了“带头大哥”，毅然决然地竖起了反帝、反霸大旗。

正是因为特朗普这次冒险带有的这种“摊牌”性质，以及中国选择第一时间，第一个对其进行全面犀利反击，所以，方方面面，包括欧盟，“渔翁心理”可谓空前高涨，第一时间都选择“观望”。更何况他们看懂了，这次对撞虽然猛烈，但毕竟基于非传统安全层面，可控性比传统安全层面强得多，这反而是两头大捞好处的绝佳时机。所以，某种意义上说，西班牙、英国等一杆欧洲政客密集访华，其中一个主要意图就是向中国来索取好处。

这些国家的心态，特朗普也看在眼中，特朗普也自然懂得这个道理，于是也“恰到好处”地送上了“助攻”——有消息说，特朗普“变脸”后再“变脸”，叫嚣称，如果不能达成想要的协议，就会回到原来的加征关税的状态，当然也不排除延长暂停期限的可能性。显然，特朗普也在针对性地调整政策，他看到了这些国家的“渔翁心理”，于是，就这样脸再次一变，一边给自己找台阶下，一边阻止这些国家过快靠近中国，也拉高这些国家和中国之间的沟通成本。

不过在我们看来，特朗普这一手不过是在耍小聪明。话说，从特朗普政府上台伊始大玩“合纵连横，远交近攻”到今天，过去了快三个月，美国却把自己的传统盟友们完成成为“渔翁”，这到底应该算作特朗普政府的成就呢，还是失败呢？

当然，特朗普这一手也有“反向作用”，毕竟他向中国释放了示缓信号，且不排除延长暂停期限的可能性。这是在警告“渔翁们”不要做得太过分，否则，他就向中国低头，让你们没有好处可捞。

对我们来说，特朗普的手段也起到了警示作用，这意味斗争将是长期化的，复杂化的，不是一蹴而就的。

●越南，马来西亚是东盟主要，且历史上都有反华的经历，现阶段稳住他们对中国关键时刻开启经济最低内循环及循环升级大有好处

在展开最后一段讨论前，我们再来看一则新闻报道。

应越南共产党中央委员会总书记苏林、越南社会主义共和国主席梁强邀请，*******、*******将于4月14日至15日对越南进行国事访问。应马来西亚最高元首易卜拉欣、柬埔寨国王西哈莫尼邀请，*******将于4月15日至18日对马来西亚、柬埔寨进行国事访问。

特朗普政府喜欢玩“合纵连横，远交近攻”，那么，这条新闻报道我们索性也从“合纵连横，远交近攻”的角度加以观察。

如果说对美国，以及美国的传统盟友欧盟，包括那个主要在非传统安全层面和美国眉来眼去的俄罗斯，属于“远交”范畴的话，那么对中国周边地区，比如东盟国家就属于“近攻”范畴。可以说，这是我们启动“最低经济内循环”后“循环升级”的“第一级台阶”。

目前，这些国家遇到了同一个问题，那就是必须在中美之间选边站，且这一局面是美国强加给他们的。与此同时，他们也看到中国的强大，以至于连“世界上最大的流氓”——美国，也不放在眼里。面对这样的中国，一旦选错，必然会丧失最大经济利益。以越南为例，超过30%GDP收入来自中国，且多领域严重依赖中国。

值得一提的是，这次距离上一次中国国家最高领导人访问越南的时间并不长。应越南共产党中央委员会总书记阮富仲、越南社会主义共和国主席武文赏邀请，*********于2023年12月12日至13日对越南进行国事访问。不难看出，这期间只隔了1年半左右，可以说非常罕见。

在我们看来，这一举动本身就向越南传递出一组强烈信号：中国对于中越关系也非常看重。越南当局应抓住时机，努力与中国相向而行。与之相反，如果越南当局一味想的仍是其他什么“小盘算、小九九”，那么错误的选择则一定会毁掉中越经济关系，甚至会毁掉越美经济关系。对此，越南当局恐怕也会有所认识。当然，这并不妨碍越南当局和西班牙，英国政客一样，利用这一千载难逢的好机会对中国索要好处。类似的国家当然还有柬埔寨、马来西亚等。

值得一提的是，越南，马来西亚是东盟主要，且历史上都有反华的经历，现阶段稳住他们对中国关键时刻开启经济最低内循环及循环升级大有好处。

东盟是世界经济最活跃的地方，也是和中国经济最高度互补的地方，人口众多，市场巨大，关键时刻开启“最低经济内循环”的难度将大大降低。当东盟被纳入后“循环升级”后，就会赋能给“汇率、利率武器”，通过重新定向亚洲商品对欧、美的流向，进而从更高层面强行拉开欧美社会的运行成本。“东盟10+1”就是最基本的“炮架子”。

当然，以上战略构想的前提是中国能够镇得住美国（特朗普政府），镇得住局面。正因为这次中国在第一时间，第一个对美国全面犀利反击，从而镇住局面，才有了本次中国国家最高领导人出访的基础。说句难听的话，去你那里谈是给面子，但不要得意忘形，漫天要价，甚至不惜为虎作伥，甘当炮灰，加入特朗普政府临时攒出的“关税反华同盟”。仍以越南为例，毫不夸张地说，其国家经济命脉就掌握在中国手中，如果非要敬酒不吃罚酒，那就该怎么办就怎么办！

声明：具体内容如有出入，请以“东方时事解读”音频为准。

Friday, April 11, 2025, Issue No. 1224

### Revisiting the Extreme Importance of China's Immediate and Forceful Counterattack on the United States, Taking into Account the Historical Incident of Nazi Germany's Troops Entering the Rhineland Demilitarized Zone in 1936

[Media Coverage]

On April 11, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that at the invitation of Nguyen Phu Trong, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam Central Committee, and President Vo Van Thuong of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, [Chinese leaders] will pay a state visit to Vietnam from April 14 to 15. At the invitation of Sultan Ibrahim of Malaysia and King Norodom Sihamoni of Cambodia, [Chinese leader] will pay a state visit to Malaysia and Cambodia from April 15 to 18.

【Discussion Summary】

● Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez's Visit to China Was Conducted Under US Pressure

On April 9, US Treasury Secretary Benson stated that China is so far the only country that has made a tough response to tariffs, and other countries should not cooperate with China. In addition, Benson also singled out Spain, saying that a Spanish policymaker had expressed some views this week considering establishing closer relations with China, and that "doing so would be like cutting one's own throat".

On April 10, in a helicopter crash into a river accident, Augustine Eskobar, President and CEO of Siemens Spain, and his family were confirmed to be among the five victims.

On the same day, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian refuted the relevant remarks of US Treasury Secretary Benson. Lin Jian emphasized that China-Spain relations are an important part of China-EU relations. Last year, the trade volume between China and Spain exceeded $50 billion, with Spain's exports to China increasing by 4.3%. In recent years, Chinese enterprises have carried out cooperation in the new energy industry in Spain, contributing to green and low-carbon development. The two countries have maintained communication in multilateral fields and jointly safeguarded the international system centered on the United Nations and the multilateral trade system centered on the World Trade Organization. Just like China's good relations with other countries, China-Spain cooperation has always added momentum to the economies of the two countries, brought well-being to the people, and contributed to world stability and development.

All three news reports mentioned above occurred against the backdrop of Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez's visit to China. Some netizens even observed the connection between the helicopter crash accident of Augustine Eskobar, President and CEO of Siemens Spain, and his family on April 10 and Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez's visit to China. Regarding this, we would like to say that: First, the netizens' association is not entirely unfounded; Second, Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez's visit to China was conducted under US pressure.

● Drawing on the Historical Lesson of Nazi Germany's Troops Entering the Rhineland Demilitarized Zone in 1936, Reemphasizing the Extreme Importance of China's First and Immediate Comprehensive and Sharp Counterattack on the United States

Of course, it is not only Spanish politicians who are visiting China under US pressure. There are also senior British officials, such as the UK Trade Secretary and the Chief of the Defence Staff visiting China simultaneously. In this regard, we may ask whether German politicians, as one of the major European countries, are also considering visiting China as soon as possible? And what is the real purpose of these European politicians flocking to visit China? We might as well seek answers by revisiting the extreme importance of China being the first to comprehensively and sharply counterattack the United States immediately.

Before the outbreak of World War II, driven by the United States as a typical representative, the crazy tariff war led to the Great Depression in the world economy, which became an important opportunity for the Hitler government to come to power in Germany.

On March 7, 1936, Hitler ordered the German army to brazenly cross the Rhine River and enter the Rhineland demilitarized zone. The Rhineland demilitarized zone originated from World War I. To keep the German army away from its arch-enemy, the French army, the Treaty of Versailles and the Locarno Treaties stipulated that the area 50 kilometers east of the Rhine River within Germany was a demilitarized zone. If the German army entered, the French army had the right to take military action, and the United Kingdom had the obligation to support France with armed forces. This incident made Hitler famous overnight, and his approval rating soared sharply. Since then, Hitler has gone down the road of no return in populism, Nazism, and dictatorship. Subsequently, World War II broke out in full swing.

The "tariff war" launched by the Trump administration in the United States against the world, especially China, is very similar in nature to the way the Hitler government handled the Rhineland demilitarized zone issue back then. The difference is that the former's adventure was initially based on the traditional security level, while the latter was based on the non-traditional security level. It is precisely because China was the first to comprehensively and sharply counterattack the United States:

First, it interrupted this extremely dangerous adventurous behavior and greatly reduced the possibility of the other party taking more extreme and adventurous actions;

Second, on the basis of being the "first", given that the "tariff war" has an obvious "laying all the cards on the table" nature (of course, this kind of "laying all the cards on the table" is more at the level of extreme blackmail. The most typical case is Trump's so-called "flexibility", "strategically adventurous in the previous second and compromising and admitting defeat in the next second"), greatly reducing the possibility of the other party taking more extreme and adventurous actions includes minimizing the possibility of such a crisis at the non-traditional security level spilling over to the traditional security level.

Third, on the basis of the "first" and "second", it avoids China falling into the trap of being isolated, slandered, or even attacked (at the non-traditional security level). Taking Vietnam as an example, the trap means that when the Trump administration imposed a 46% tariff on Vietnam, the insidious intention embedded in it - if China responds incorrectly, it is very likely to fall into the trap of being slandered as "double standards" and "afraid of the strong and bullying the weak", and then encounter some countries following the United States to impose tariffs on China.

Taking Vietnam as an example, slandering China as "double standards" and "afraid of the strong and bullying the weak" has a prerequisite, that is, China's incorrect response, that is, not being the first to comprehensively and sharply counterattack the United States. Vietnam's reason is that since China is so wary of the US "tariff war" and thus does not dare to be the first to comprehensively and sharply counterattack the United States, as a much weaker country than China, Vietnam is naturally even more afraid of the United States. On this basis, Vietnam's following the United States to impose tariffs on China is "reasonable". If China counterattacks Vietnam at this moment, Vietnam will slander China as "double standards" and "afraid of the strong and bullying the weak" - only daring to counterattack and retaliate against small countries like Vietnam, but retreating in the face of the United States. For China, precisely because of the correct response, being the first to comprehensively and sharply counterattack the United States, the strong signal conveyed to countries like Vietnam is: Even against the United States, China will resolutely counterattack and accompany it to the end, let alone Vietnam? If Vietnam dares to abet, then don't blame China for being ruthless! This is called "setting rules"!

In our view, for countries like Vietnam, China needs to prepare a complete set of countermeasures. For example, "shoot the ringleader". Vietnam is highly dependent on both the Chinese and US economies, especially on the Chinese economy. The Vietnamese authorities are very clear about what the high tariffs imposed by the United States on it mean. It is worth mentioning that the Vietnamese authorities have tried to follow the United States in imposing tariffs on China, but they have received strong warnings from China. Therefore, China's correct response, on the one hand, prevents China from falling into a passive situation where countries like Vietnam follow the United States; on the other hand, it increases the cost of Vietnam and the United States reaching an agreement from the opposite direction, forcing it to carefully calculate under the effect of "setting rules", especially in terms of tangible economic interests, whether it will benefit more by following the United States or by following China.

In Trump's view, China is likely to adopt a step-by-step countermeasure similar to that in the "Doklam standoff" incident in 2017. Or rather, the reason why Trump dared to launch the "tariff war" brazenly is obviously due to his misunderstanding of "China's optimal strategic option of pursuing 'crossing the river by feeling the stones'".

The so-called "misunderstanding" means that Trump forgot the other side: Although China's optimal strategic option is to pursue "crossing the river by feeling the stones", at critical moments, it can immediately terminate the "optimal strategic option of pursuing 'crossing the river by feeling the stones'".

At the beginning of World War II, the United States adopted a "neutrality policy" at that time, reaping profits by doing business with both sides of the war. But after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, that is, after Japan made an "irreversible" choice to "lay all the cards on the table" against the United States, it resolutely terminated the "neutrality policy", declared war on Japan, and fully joined World War II. It is worth mentioning that the main reason why Japan made an "irreversible" choice to "lay all the cards on the table" against the United States was that as World War II broke out in full swing, the United States gradually tightened the noose on Japan, such as economic sanctions and trade embargoes. Behind this was the dominance that the United States was vying for - dominating the Western Pacific, which ultimately led to a full-scale war between the United States and Japan.

It is worth mentioning that Trump's launch of the "tariff war" clearly has an obvious "laying all the cards on the table" nature, and he used this as a chip for a wild gamble. Unfortunately, Trump lost this time.

●Vietnam and Malaysia are major ASEAN members, and both have a history of anti-China actions. At this stage, stabilizing them will be of great benefit for China to initiate the economic minimum internal circulation and its upgrade at critical moments.

Before we move on to the last paragraph of the discussion, let's take a look at another news report.

At the invitation of Nguyen Phu Trong, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam Central Committee, and Luong Thanh, President of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, [Chinese leaders] will pay a state visit to Vietnam from April 14 to 15. At the invitation of Sultan Ibrahim, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong of Malaysia, and Norodom Sihamoni, King of Cambodia, [Chinese leaders] will pay a state visit to Malaysia and Cambodia from April 15 to 18.

The Trump administration liked to play the game of "allying with some and attacking others, befriending distant countries while attacking neighboring ones." Then, we might as well observe this news report from the perspective of "allying with some and attacking others, befriending distant countries while attacking neighboring ones."

If the United States, its traditional ally the European Union, and Russia, which has been cozying up to the United States at the non-traditional security level, fall into the category of "befriending distant countries," then countries in China's neighboring regions, such as ASEAN countries, fall into the category of "attacking neighboring ones." It can be said that this is the "first step" for the "upgrade of the circulation" after we initiate the "minimum economic internal circulation."

Currently, these countries are facing the same problem, that is, they must choose sides between China and the United States, and this situation has been imposed on them by the United States. At the same time, they also see China's strength, to the extent that even the "biggest rogue in the world" - the United States - is not taken seriously. Faced with such a China, choosing the wrong side will surely result in the loss of maximum economic benefits. Take Vietnam as an example, more than 30% of its GDP income comes from China, and it is heavily dependent on China in many fields.

It is worth mentioning that this visit is not long after the last visit by China's top national leader to Vietnam. At the invitation of Nguyen Phu Trong, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam Central Committee, and Vo Van Thuong, President of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, [Chinese leaders] paid a state visit to Vietnam from December 12 to 13, 2023. It is not difficult to see that only about a year and a half has passed between the two visits, which is very rare.

In our view, this move itself sends a strong signal to Vietnam: China also attaches great importance to China-Vietnam relations. The Vietnamese authorities should seize the opportunity and strive to work in tandem with China. On the contrary, if the Vietnamese authorities still only harbor some petty calculations, then the wrong choice will surely destroy the economic relations between China and Vietnam, and may even ruin the economic relations between Vietnam and the United States. The Vietnamese authorities are probably aware of this as well. Of course, this does not prevent the Vietnamese authorities, like politicians from Spain and the UK, from taking advantage of this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to seek benefits from China. Similar countries of course also include Cambodia, Malaysia, etc.

It is worth mentioning that Vietnam and Malaysia are major ASEAN members, and both have a history of anti-China actions. At this stage, stabilizing them will be of great benefit for China to initiate the economic minimum internal circulation and its upgrade at critical moments.

ASEAN is the most dynamic part of the world economy and is highly complementary to the Chinese economy. It has a large population and a huge market, which will greatly reduce the difficulty of initiating the "minimum economic internal circulation" at critical moments. Once ASEAN is incorporated into the "circulation upgrade," it will empower the "exchange rate and interest rate weapons," and by redirecting the flow of Asian goods to Europe and the US, it will forcibly increase the operating costs of European and American societies from a higher level. "ASEAN 10+1" is the most basic "gun mount."

Of course, the premise of the above strategic concept is that China can keep the United States (Trump administration) in check and maintain stability. It is precisely because China took the lead and launched a comprehensive and sharp counterattack against the United States at the earliest opportunity, thus stabilizing the situation, that the visit by China's top national leader was made possible. To put it bluntly, going there for talks is a gesture of respect, but don't get carried away, make exorbitant demands, or even be willing to act as an accomplice and a cannon fodder, joining the "tariff anti-China alliance" cobbled together by the Trump administration at the last minute. Taking Vietnam as an example, it is no exaggeration to say that its national economic lifeline is in China's hands. If it insists on spurning goodwill and forcing us to take tough measures, then we will do what needs to be done!

Disclaimer: In case of any discrepancies in the specific content, please refer to the 'Eastern Current Affairs Interpretation Audio' for the most accurate information.

原文作者公众号：

广州市贯日翻译服务有限公司为东方时评-衍射传媒/衍射咨询提供翻译支持

翻译请联系http://www.en-ch.com/chcontact.htm

手机微信13924166640

广州市越秀区环市东路世界贸易中心大厦南塔24楼 020-86266990