2025年4月2日，星期二，第1216期

我东部战区4月1日位台岛周边开展多兵种联合演训传递出哪些强烈信号？

【媒体报道】

4月1日，中国人民解放军东部战区组织陆军、海军、空军、火箭军等兵力，位台岛周边组织舰机多向抵近台岛，重点演练海空战备警巡、夺取综合制权、对海对陆打击、要域要道封控等科目，检验战区部队联合作战实战能力。

【讨论纪要】

●再次强调，台湾问题是中国核心利益，台湾就是中国的一个省。任何涉及“交易台湾”的话题特朗普政府提都不要提

我们注意到东部战区新闻发言人施毅陆军大校有关，“4月1日开始，中国人民解放军东部战区组织陆军、海军、空军、火箭军等兵力，位台岛周边组织舰机多向抵近台岛，重点演练海空战备警巡、夺取综合制权、对海对陆打击、要域要道封控等科目，检验战区部队联合作战实战能力”的新闻报道。

随着美国两拨人马访华失败，为特朗普求得访华“机票”均已失败告终，特朗普恼羞成怒，再度通过讹诈手段胁迫国际社会，妄图为其访华一事强行打开局面。特朗普一边通过继续推动尹锡悦弹劾案后续发展围绕朝鲜半岛局势制造紧张气氛，破坏地区安全环境；另一边怂恿赖清德“台独”当局顽固坚持“台独”分裂立场，悍然将大陆界定为“境外敌对势力”，抛出所谓“17项策略”，猖狂挑衅大陆，煽动“反中抗中”，阻挠两岸交流合作，加剧台海紧张局势。

对此，国际社会针锋相对，犀利反击：一方面，在黄渤海海域举行军事演习，以对朝鲜进行必要之战略策应。据中国海事局网站消息，葫芦岛海事局发布航行警告，3月30日12时至18时，渤海北部部分海域进行军事演习，禁止驶入；另一方面，从4月1日开始，中国人民解放军东部战区组织陆军、海军、空军、火箭军等兵力，位台岛周边地区组织联合演训。

在我们的观察与评估中，目前台海局势用“或今晚武统台湾”形容都不准确，而应该用“随时可能擦枪走火，随时武统台湾”来形容。值得大家注意的是，在解放军的全面支持下，中国海警已经开始演练执法权。这意味着以后进出台湾的任何物品，中国海警有权检查，甚至查扣，这就是在准备全面封锁台湾的节奏。此外，在动手方面，本次演习细节说的也很明白——实兵实弹。意味着这次联合演训随时“从演变战”。换言之，是否擦枪走火，主动权不在“台独”当局。

有趣的是，面对解放军的联合演训，尤其是已于3月31日进入台所谓“应变区”的“山东舰”编队。台所谓“防务部门”却称，已启动“应变机制”，适切应对。什么是“适切应对”？这里不妨先和大家聊聊“应变区”这个由“台独”当局（美特朗普政府）发明的新说法。

2024年6月，台“防务部门”为应对解放军行动提出了所谓“应变区”。所谓“应变区”的大致位置在距离台岛40海里至12海里之间。台“防务部门”负责人顾立雄当时在接受质询时表示，台湾将不再执行“第一击”策略，而是行使自卫权，标准是当解放军攻击台航机舰设施、攻击本外离岛或未经许可进入12海里海空时，台军将视“威胁程度”进行合比例的反击。

如果我们用一句话形容所谓“应变区”以及“适切应对”，那就是，坚决不给解放军任何“打第一枪”的机会。或者说，面对解放军的这次联合演训，对什么是“擦枪走火”，什么是“‘威胁程度’进行合比例的反击”，“台独”当局“说了才算”。挑衅可以，但不能导致大陆立即武装收台，护栏要打，脸可以不要。如此滑稽可笑的一幕，将“台独”当局及其背后怂恿的特朗普政府，在台湾问题上对中国极尽挑拨之能事但内心又怕得要死的扭曲矛盾心态展现的淋漓尽致。

需要补充的是，本次战备警巡与联合演训这是对“台独”分裂势力的严重警告和有力遏制，是捍卫国家主权、维护国家统一的正当必要行动。同时再次向特朗普政府传递明确且强烈的信号：台湾问题是中国核心利益，台湾就是中国的一个省。任何涉及“交易台湾”的话题特朗普政府提都不要提。

●如果特朗普修改了美国宪法，那这份矿产协议变为优质资产包的可能性就大大增加

看到中美关系如此状态的俄罗斯岂有不抓住时机，对特朗普政府“狮子大开口”的理由？俄罗斯的最新利益诉求就是通过公开质疑乌克兰泽连斯基政府合法性的方式“技术性”的撕毁了此前美俄在沙特利雅达成的关于乌克兰问题的阶段性协议。所谓“技术性”的意思就在于，俄罗斯并没有直接撕毁协议，而是通过质疑乌克兰泽连斯基政府合法性提出“换签字人”。而俄罗斯眼中的“合法乌克兰政府”当然会是一个亲俄的乌克兰政府。

俄罗斯在明斯克问题上是上过欧美的当的，所以，除了务虚层面，如，克里米亚和东乌的归属权问题外，俄罗斯更要实实在在的利益，比如，全面解除对俄罗斯的经济，尤其是金融裁。

对特朗普来说，美乌矿产协议某种意义上说也是务虚的，比如，可能随时因俄罗斯、欧盟，甚至乌克兰内部政治变化而变为废纸一张；再比如，这些矿产想要变为实打实的利益需要完整的产业链、配套基础设施、电力供应和大量的技术工人，这些在短期内都无法实现。相比之下，赢得内斗，大规模公开启动印钞机，进行独裁统治，开启“红巨星效应”，要显得实在的多。特朗普很清楚，只有做到这些，自己才能走的更远。至少在这个过程中，可以确保特朗普本人和其小集团继续大赚特赚。

当然，话说回来，美国毕竟以虚拟经济为主，矿产协议签署后还是用于可以融资，和画饼的。尤其在美国股市遭遇“DeepSeek+华为+新凯莱”猛烈冲击一蹶不振的情况下显得尤为重要。这既可以帮助特朗普更好的赢得内斗，也能和俄罗斯继续谈交易，包括稀土合作等等，还能“塞进公文包”带到北京去。

值得大家注意的是，近日，特朗普暗示其可能再干四年，并称“有方法可以做到”来看。在我们看来，如果特朗普修改了美国宪法，那这份矿产协议变为优质资产包的可能性就大大增加。而为了更好的讲故事，特朗普需要寻找合作者，比如，俄罗斯。

●问题在于，面对“普京的大脑”和“普京的喉舌”完全不同的两套说辞，特朗普打算相信哪个？亦或是都不相信？

此前我们讨论过，俄美可能在非传统安全层面展开合作的相关话题。基于上一节讨论，在俄美经济结构似乎变得越来越趋同，中国能源供应会更多侧重于多元化，中国在军火贸易方面与美国和俄罗斯的竞争愈加激烈的综合背景下。尤其在都不希望中国强大这一意识形态趋同的背景下。俄美可能在非传统安全层面展开合作的可能性在不断提高，而一旦双方进行非传统安全层面的合作，则必然会涉及传统安全层面。

近日，我们注意到素有“普京的大脑”之称的俄罗斯知名政治学者杜金的相关最新言论。杜金称，“特朗普的美国”和“普京的俄罗斯”有很多共同点。

杜金的言论让我们想起了“雅尔塔体系V2.0”。问题在于，毕竟今天的俄罗斯不是当年的苏联。某种意义上说，今天的美国也不再是当年的美国，中国更不是当年的中国。在当今世界格局下再谈“雅尔塔体系V2.0”多多少少显得有些不识时务。有趣的是，就在前几天，作为“普京的喉舌”的俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫刚刚表示过，俄美两国利益永远不会一致，且重合度甚至不可能达到50%。对此我们不禁要问，面对“普京的大脑”和“普京的喉舌”完全不同的两套说辞，我们要相信哪个？

这个答案并不难，我们只相信自己。但问题在于，特朗普打算相信哪个？亦或是都不相信？

在第一节的讨论中，我们着重讨论了中美之间的博弈和较量。围绕台湾问题，中国的态度异常强硬也是在变相鼓励俄罗斯，对美国该怎么要价就怎么要价。于是，杜金口中与美国拥有很多共同点的俄罗斯就这样“技术性”撕毁了利雅得俄美双方阶段性的谈判结果。而面对中美关系非但没有缓和反而变得愈发僵硬的特朗普政府，面对这样一个俄罗斯，也显得颇为无可奈何。于是，在特朗普无能狂怒，抱怨两句之后，只能回头再找俄罗斯继续谈。置于谈什么，答案很简单，自然是 谈俄罗斯想要的，比如，解除制裁，重返中东，乌克兰问题进一步妥协。

讽刺的是，作为目前正在与美国交手（间接交手）的敌人，俄罗斯对特朗普来说，似乎合作显得更有意义，比如，此前我们讨论的能源和稀土合作，所谓“俄美新关系”框架下的“雅尔塔体系V2.0”等。用此前我们给出的“麻将桌儿”理论形容就是，美俄似乎正靠的越来越近，或者说，特朗普政府不得不更加靠近俄罗斯，尽管俄罗斯对美国是“又耍又闹”。至少对特朗普来说，那份虽然务虚的美乌矿产协议就可以拿过来炒股票，炒金融。而对俄罗斯而言，这样的俄美关系自然也有利于其“阿富汗政策小九九”恢复活力。

不过，如此玩法，看上去只对特朗普和“特朗普们”有意义，而对美国国家利益而言损失巨大。美国挖国际社会的墙角，国际社会更可以挑拨离间，比如，通过强化我方在台湾问题上的立场原则，尤其是展示随时收台之能力和决心，大幅拉高美俄媾和的门槛儿。更可以利用在美俄关系缓和过程中利益不断受损的欧盟大做文章。

●基于生化战争的角度需要再次提醒俄罗斯决策层的是......

在本期回顾的最后，我们再来看一则新闻报道。

4月1日，商务部部长王文涛会见美国桥水基金创始人达利欧。双方就全球经济形势、中美经贸关系等议题进行交流。

达利欧在代言西方资本利益的美国资本利益集团只拓扑结构图中扮演了“掌柜”的，或者是“具体办事人”的角色。在我们看来，也许本次达利欧访华并不能办成什么实质性的事情，但对于缓和当下不断紧张的中美关系还是有所益处的。想必特朗普也想趁此机会仔细想想下一步到底应该怎么办。也许到了特朗普想明白的时候，美方来求机票的正式的第三拨人马就会正式露面动身了。

当然，美俄合作有一个可能的缝合点，在中东。所以，他们会继续在沙特继续谈乌克兰问题。

对特朗普来说，要做的事情太多了，比如，搞定以色列、土耳其，摆平伊朗，盯着欧盟，讨好沙特...中国只要盯上家，卡下家即可。打麻将最需要的就是时间，而国际社会最喜欢的也是时间。

某种意义上说，中东已经大乱，美国已无力控制。话说，原来中国希望有张办公桌，现在直接把国粹搬了过去。中国在中东架起来麻将桌一起玩，而且是各方请中国来打麻将。十几年，沧海桑田。

最后需要提醒俄罗斯，仔细看看如此美国，俄方好梦想所谓“雅尔塔体系V2.0”玩出什么实质性的内容吗？此外，我们更基于生化战争的角度再次提醒俄罗斯决策层。

另外，近日俄罗斯出现未知病毒事件，值得国际社会高度警惕：即便目前俄罗斯方面暂未定性，但，这极可能是“有前科”的西方邪恶势力刻意所为。如果是样，那么，这对俄罗斯而言，其极限施压的压力，不亚于“乌克兰战争升级”中的另一个手段---西方邪恶势力点燃扎波罗热核电站。事实上，在此前，在2023年10月7日阿克萨洪水行动以后的中东形势中，甚至在特朗普政府上台后与俄罗斯之间的“乌克兰问题谈判”中，东方时事解读一再提醒俄罗斯：不能一味地拖，否则，还会付出巨大的代价。诸如在2023年10月7日阿克萨洪水行动以后，俄罗斯始终未在中东方向、选择叙利亚、利用各路反美力量，对非法盘踞在叙利亚的美军基地进行直接反击，将美军彻底推入中东泥滩、最终导致俄罗斯纯血领土被乌克兰（北约）入侵至今！

声明：具体内容如有出入，请以“东方时事解读”音频为准。

Tuesday, April 2, 2025, Issue No. 1216

What strong signals are conveyed by the joint multi-service training conducted by the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army around Taiwan Island on April 1?

[Media Coverage]

On April 1, the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army organized troops from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, etc., to conduct multi-directional approaches of ships and aircraft near Taiwan Island. The training focused on key subjects such as maritime and air combat readiness patrols, seizing comprehensive control, maritime and land strikes, and the blockade of key areas and routes, aiming to test the actual combat capabilities of the theater forces in joint operations.

【Discussion Summary】

● Once again emphasizing that the Taiwan issue is China's core interest, and Taiwan is a province of China. Any topic regarding "trading Taiwan" should not even be mentioned by the Trump administration.

We have noted the news report from the Eastern Theater Command's spokesperson, Senior Colonel Shi Yi of the Army, stating that "starting from April 1, the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army organized troops from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, etc., to conduct multi-directional approaches of ships and aircraft near Taiwan Island. The training focused on key subjects such as maritime and air combat readiness patrols, seizing comprehensive control, maritime and land strikes, and the blockade of key areas and routes, aiming to test the actual combat capabilities of the theater forces in joint operations."

With the failure of two groups of Americans visiting China, all attempts to secure a "ticket" for Trump's visit to China have ended in failure. Trump, humiliated and enraged, has once again resorted to blackmail tactics to coerce the international community, attempting to forcefully open the situation for his visit to China. On one hand, Trump continues to push forward the subsequent development of the impeachment case against Yoon Suk-yeol, creating tension around the Korean Peninsula situation and disrupting regional security. On the other hand, he encourages the "Taiwan independence" authorities led by Lai Qingde to stubbornly adhere to their "Taiwan independence" separatist stance, brazenly defining the mainland as "foreign hostile forces," putting forward so-called "17 strategies," wantonly provoking the mainland, inciting "anti-China and anti-communist" sentiments, obstructing cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, and exacerbating tensions in the Taiwan Strait.

In response, the international community has fought back sharply: on one hand, conducting military exercises in the Yellow and Bohai Seas to provide necessary strategic support to North Korea. According to the website of the China Maritime Safety Administration, the Huludao Maritime Safety Administration issued a navigation warning stating that military exercises will be conducted in certain areas of the northern Bohai Sea from 12:00 to 18:00 on March 30, prohibiting entry; on the other hand, starting from April 1, the Eastern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army organized troops from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, etc., to conduct joint training near Taiwan Island.

In our observation and assessment, the current situation in the Taiwan Strait cannot be described as "perhaps tonight we will take military action against Taiwan," but rather as "tensions could escalate into military action at any moment." It is worth noting that, with the full support of the Liberation Army, the China Coast Guard has already begun to practice law enforcement authority. This means that in the future, any goods entering or leaving Taiwan will be subject to inspection and even seizure by the China Coast Guard, which is a preparation for a comprehensive blockade of Taiwan. Additionally, in terms of taking action, the details of this exercise are also clear—live ammunition. This means that this joint training could "transition from evolution to war" at any moment. In other words, whether tensions escalate into military action is not up to the "Taiwan independence" authorities.

Interestingly, in the face of the joint training by the Liberation Army, especially the "Shandong" ship formation that entered Taiwan's so-called "response zone" on March 31, Taiwan's so-called "Defense Department" claimed to have activated a "response mechanism" to respond appropriately. What does "appropriate response" mean? Here, let's first talk about the "response zone," a new term invented by the "Taiwan independence" authorities (with the support of the Trump administration).

In June 2024, Taiwan's "Defense Department" proposed the so-called "response zone" in response to the actions of the Liberation Army. The approximate location of the "response zone" is between 40 nautical miles and 12 nautical miles from Taiwan Island. Gu Li-xiong, the head of Taiwan's "Defense Department," stated during questioning that Taiwan would no longer implement the "first strike" strategy but would exercise the right of self-defense. The standard is that when the Liberation Army attacks Taiwanese aviation and naval facilities, attacks on outer islands, or enters the 12-nautical-mile airspace and sea area without permission, the Taiwanese military will respond proportionally based on the "level of threat."

If we were to describe the so-called "response zone" and "appropriate response" in one sentence, it would be that they resolutely do not give the Liberation Army any opportunity to "fire the first shot." Or in other words, in the face of this joint training by the Liberation Army, what constitutes "escalation into military action" and what is a "proportional response to the level of threat" is up to the "Taiwan independence" authorities to decide. Provocation is allowed, but it must not lead to immediate military action by the mainland. The guardrails can be breached, but the face can be lost. Such a farcical scene fully exposes the twisted and contradictory mentality of the "Taiwan independence" authorities and the Trump administration, which tries its utmost to provoke China on the Taiwan issue but is terrified inside.

It should be added that this combat readiness patrol and joint training is a severe warning and powerful containment of the "Taiwan independence" separatist forces, a just and necessary action to defend national sovereignty and maintain national unity. At the same time, it once again sends a clear and strong signal to the Trump administration: the Taiwan issue is China's core interest, and Taiwan is a province of China. Any topic regarding "trading Taiwan" should not even be mentioned by the Trump administration.

● If Trump amends the U.S. Constitution, the possibility of this mining agreement becoming a high-quality asset package greatly increases.

Seeing the state of Sino-U.S. relations, how could Russia miss the opportunity to make exorbitant demands on the Trump administration? Russia's latest interest is to "technically" tear up the previously reached phase agreement on Ukraine between the U.S. and Russia in Riyadh by publicly questioning the legitimacy of the Ukrainian Zelensky government. The so-called "technical" means that Russia did not directly tear up the agreement but proposed to "change the signatory" by questioning the legitimacy of the Ukrainian Zelensky government. And the "legitimate Ukrainian government" in Russia's eyes would certainly be a pro-Russian Ukrainian government.

Russia has been deceived by the West on the Minsk issue, so in addition to the superficial level, such as the ownership of Crimea and eastern Ukraine, Russia also seeks tangible benefits, such as the complete lifting of economic, especially financial, sanctions against Russia.

For Trump, the U.S.-Ukraine mining agreement is somewhat superficial in meaning; for example, it may become worthless at any time due to changes in the political situations of Russia, the European Union, or even within Ukraine. Moreover, turning these minerals into tangible benefits requires a complete industrial chain, supporting infrastructure, power supply, and a large number of skilled workers, none of which can be achieved in the short term. In comparison, winning the internal struggle, launching the printing press on a large scale, conducting dictatorial rule, and initiating the "Red Giant Effect" seem much more tangible. Trump is very clear that only by achieving these can he go further. At least in this process, he can ensure that he and his small group continue to make huge profits.

Of course, having said that, the United States is still mainly a virtual economy, and the mining agreement, once signed, is still used for financing and pie-in-the-sky promises. This is particularly important in the context of the U.S. stock market being severely hit by "DeepSeek+Huawei+New Kelai." This can help Trump win the internal struggle better, continue to negotiate deals with Russia, including rare earth cooperation, and even "stuff it into his briefcase" to bring to Beijing.

It is worth noting that recently, Trump hinted that he might run for another four years and said, "I have a way to do it." In our view, if Trump amends the U.S. Constitution, the possibility of this mining agreement becoming a high-quality asset package greatly increases. And to tell a better story, Trump needs to find collaborators, such as Russia.

● The question is, faced with two completely different sets of statements from "Putin's brain" and "Putin's mouthpiece," which one does Trump plan to believe? Or does he believe neither?

Previously, we discussed the possibility of Russia and the United States cooperating on non-traditional security issues. Based on the previous discussion, as the economic structures of Russia and the United States seem to be becoming more and more similar, China's energy supply will focus more on diversification, and China's competition with the United States and Russia in the arms trade is becoming increasingly fierce. Especially against the backdrop of an ideological convergence where neither side wants to see China become powerful, the possibility of Russia and the United States cooperating on non-traditional security issues is increasing. Once the two sides engage in cooperation on non-traditional security issues, it will inevitably involve traditional security aspects.

Recently, we noted the latest remarks by Dmitry Dugin, a well-known Russian political scholar often referred to as "Putin's brain." Dugin stated that "Trump's America" and "Putin's Russia" have a lot in common.

Dugin's remarks remind us of the "Yalta System V2.0." The question is, after all, today's Russia is not the Soviet Union of the past. In a sense, today's United States is also no longer the United States of the past, and China is certainly not the China of the past. Discussing the "Yalta System V2.0" in today's world order seems somewhat out of touch with reality. Interestingly, just a few days ago, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, often considered "Putin's mouthpiece," stated that the interests of Russia and the United States will never align, and their overlap is unlikely to reach even 50%. This raises the question: faced with two completely different sets of statements from "Putin's brain" and "Putin's mouthpiece," which one should we believe?

The answer is not difficult; we only believe in ourselves. But the question is, what does Trump plan to believe? Or does he believe neither?

In the first section of our discussion, we focused on the competition and rivalry between China and the United States. Surrounding the Taiwan issue, China's unusually tough stance is also indirectly encouraging Russia to demand whatever it wants from the United States. As a result, Russia, which Dugin claims shares many commonalities with the United States, has "technically" torn up the phase negotiation results between Russia and the United States in Riyadh. Faced with a Trump administration where Sino-U.S. relations have not only failed to ease but have become increasingly rigid, and facing such a Russia, the Trump administration seems rather helpless. Thus, after Trump's impotent rant and complaints, he can only turn back to continue negotiations with Russia. As for what to discuss, the answer is simple: naturally, it is about what Russia wants, such as lifting sanctions, re-entering the Middle East, and further compromises on the Ukraine issue.

The irony is that, as an enemy currently engaged in (indirect) combat with the United States, Russia seems to hold more significance for cooperation with Trump. For example, the energy and rare earth cooperation we discussed earlier, and the "Yalta System V2.0" under the so-called "new U.S.-Russia relationship" framework. Using the "mahjong table" theory we previously introduced, it seems that the United States and Russia are getting closer, or at least the Trump administration has to get closer to Russia, despite Russia's "trickery and mischief" towards the United States. At least for Trump, the seemingly impractical U.S.-Ukraine mining agreement can be used to speculate in stocks and finance. For Russia, such a U.S.-Russia relationship is naturally also conducive to revitalizing its "Afghanistan policy little tricks."

However, such a game seems only meaningful for Trump and "Trump's people," while it represents a significant loss to U.S. national interests. As the United States undermines the international community, the international community can stir up discord, such as by strengthening China's stance and principles on the Taiwan issue, especially by demonstrating the capability and determination to recover Taiwan at any time, significantly raising the threshold for U.S.-Russia rapprochement. The European Union, which has been continuously damaged during the process of U.S.-Russia relations easing, can also be exploited.

● From the perspective of biochemical warfare, it is necessary to once again remind the Russian decision-making layer that...

At the end of this issue's review, let's take a look at another news report.

On April 1, Wang Wentao, the Minister of Commerce, met with Ray Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater Associates in the United States. The two sides exchanged views on topics such as the global economic situation and Sino-U.S. economic and trade relations.

Dalio plays the role of the "manager" or the "specific operator" in the topological structure diagram of the U.S. capital interest group that represents Western capital interests. In our view, perhaps Dalio's visit to China this time may not achieve any substantive results, but it is still beneficial for easing the currently tense Sino-U.S. relations. Presumably, Trump also wants to take this opportunity to carefully consider what his next steps should be. Perhaps when Trump figures it out, the official third wave of people seeking a "ticket" from the U.S. side will officially show up and set off.

Of course, there is a possible point of convergence for U.S.-Russia cooperation in the Middle East. Therefore, they will continue to talk about the Ukraine issue in Saudi Arabia.

For Trump, there is too much to do, such as dealing with Israel, Turkey, managing Iran, keeping an eye on the European Union, and courting Saudi Arabia... China just needs to focus on its own position and keep an eye on the next player. The most important thing in playing mahjong is time, and what the international community likes most is also time.

In a sense, the Middle East is already in great chaos, and the United States is unable to control it. It is said that originally China hoped to have a desk, but now it has directly brought its national essence there. China has set up a mahjong table in the Middle East for everyone to play, and it is the parties that have invited China to play mahjong. A decade has passed, and the world has changed greatly.

Finally, it is necessary to remind Russia to carefully examine such a United States. Can Russia really expect to achieve any substantive content by playing the so-called "Yalta System V2.0"? Additionally, we would like to remind the Russian decision-making layer again from the perspective of biochemical warfare.

Moreover, there has been an incident of an unknown virus in Russia recently, which deserves high vigilance from the international community: even though the Russian side has not yet classified it, it is very likely to be a deliberate act by the "Western evil forces" with a "track record." If so, then for Russia, the pressure of extreme sanctions is no less than another means in the "escalation of the Ukraine war"—the Western evil forces igniting the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. In fact, previously, after the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation on October 7, 2023, in the Middle East situation, and even in the "Ukraine issue negotiations" between the Trump administration and Russia, Oriental Time Interpretation repeatedly reminded Russia: it cannot just drag on indefinitely, otherwise, it will still pay a huge price. For example, after the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation on October 7, 2023, Russia has not directly counterattacked the U.S. military bases illegally occupying Syria from the Syrian direction, using various anti-American forces, and pushing the U.S. military thoroughly into the Middle Eastern quagmire, ultimately leading to the invasion of Russia's pure-blooded territory by Ukraine (NATO) to this day!

Disclaimer: In case of any discrepancies in the specific content, please refer to the 'Eastern Current Affairs Interpretation Audio' for the most accurate information.

原文作者公众号：

广州市贯日翻译服务有限公司为东方时评-衍射传媒/衍射咨询提供翻译支持

翻译请联系http://www.en-ch.com/chcontact.htm

手机微信13924166640

广州市越秀区环市东路世界贸易中心大厦南塔24楼 020-86266990